They tie up heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on the shoulders of others, but they themselves are unwilling to lift a finger to move them.They do all their deeds to be seen by others....
Source:
Matthew 23: 4 and 5, NRSVUE
They tie up heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on the shoulders of others, but they themselves are unwilling to lift a finger to move them.They do all their deeds to be seen by others....
The LORD looked forth from heaven upon the children of men,
I hope everyone is doing well. This post will be brief. It
is based on some things I have been dwelling on recently. Mainly, some things
Jesus is credited to saying in Scriptures that may seem contradictory. I don’t
claim to understand what he meant fully, but I also do not think he did not
make any sense. I am not going to provide entire verses; however, I will give
the citation to allow all to verify. Anyhow, here we go.
Possibly Jesus said, “if anyone strikes you on the right
cheek, turn the other also” He also said, “walk a second mile if someone
asks you to walk one.” Hence: he never said to walk three miles. See Matthew
5:39.
Supposedly, Jesus said “one who has no sword must sell
his cloak and buy one.” Basically, one needs to have a sword and can’t afford
to be without one. Obviously, he didn't seem to believe in not defending
oneself. Consequently, this seems to contrast the cheek turning thing a bit, if
things escalated perhaps. See Luke 22:36.
Lastly, Jesus said, “be
wise as serpents and innocent as doves.” I think this one is self-explanatory…don’t
be fools, but also don’t be an arrogant a**hole. See Matthew 10:16.
In closing, I think all-around, Jesus was more about having
balance. If we focus on one area of his teachings but neglect another, we get
out of balance. Therefore, we should focus on all instead of one thing.
Blessings!
References:
Matthew 5:39
Luke 22: 36
Matthew 10:16
Ancient apologists such as
Justin Martyr, Aristides of Athens, and Athenagoras presented the life of the
church as primary evidence for the truth of the faith. Irenaeus, Augustine of
Hippo, John Calvin, and many others pursued apologetics not as scholarly
specialists but as pastors who were responsible for the spiritual well-being of
ordinary Christians in local churches.
The foregoing excerpt is taken from an article on CT by Timothy Paul Jones titled: Churches Shouldn’t Outsource Apologetics to Slick Conferences. Basically, this article is a book review, although I am not providing the name of the book since I want the reader to find out for themselves by reading the article. Based on the title alone one should get the hint on who the author believes should be handling apologetics, which in part is also based on his own life experience. OK, I think I have already provided too much information, so I will stop here. Blessings, and read the full article at the link below.
For many years, archaeology has
formed an important part of Christian apologetics. As David Adams points out,
archaeology neither proves the Bible nor argues someone into faith. The raw
facts archaeologists uncover require interpretation. But for those who enjoy
the archaeological details, it provides a vast mine of data for enriching our
understanding of God’s Word and world.
The foregoing is extracted from a letter by the editor of Lutheran Witness magazine that was published in September of 2023. I am not writing much more about it, but I encourage everyone to dig deeper into the letter and article, as well as being informed on the subject. Read fully at the link below.
Catholic Answers, a San Diego apologetics non-profit, announced on Monday the launch of a new AI experiment, featuring avatar-priest “Fr. Justin,” who was designed to answer questions about the Catholic faith, using material from the Catholic Answers library of articles, talks, and apologetics tracts.
The forgoing excerpt is extracted from an article from THE PILLAR that was posted on April 24, 2024. Read the full article at the link below.
Apologetics is quite literally
defense of the faith; the Greek word apologia means “defense” as a lawyer gives
at a trial. In every generation, people face the challenges, questions, and
concerns of the gospel message of the Christian faith (www.ccu.edu).
The foregoing definition is taken out of an article from CCU
Online titled: Apologetics vs.
Evangelism: Is there a difference? Basically, I decided to use this source
randomly since the definition is simply accurate. This blog is mainly about
apologetics, and this post is basically me sharing a thought on recent online
readings on the subject.
I recently read an article on Juicy Ecumenism by Sue Cyre titled:
The Need to Recover Apologetics. Obviously, the title implies that something
has been lost. I don't know if apologetics has been completely lost; however,
the article does a pretty good job at explaining the reasons for the decline of
faith in our modern well. The following excerpt is from it.
We could trace the decline back
to the Enlightenment with contributions by historical criticism, Marxism, and
evolutionary theory. We could even trace it further back to Adam and Eve who
first decided to trust their own desires over God’s Word. Today some might add
to the reasons for decline: the church is not welcoming enough, the church
abused or oppressed people by calling them to repent; church scandals turn
people away; the church’s Bible, theology, and practice are labeled misogynist,
bigoted, and patriarchal. The list could go on (juicyecumenism.com).
It seems that one can come up with multiple reasons to
explain the decline in faith. This decline based on research alone appears to
be factual. If so, apologetics is one way of countering the decline, seemingly.
I will stop here. Feel free to share your thoughts with relevance to the
subject in the comments anytime you read on here. Blessings!
References:
https://juicyecumenism.com/2024/02/02/recover-apologetics/
https://www.ccu.edu/blogs/cags/2020/04/apologetics-vs-evangelism/
There are many forms of apologetics, and sometimes apologetics presents itself in unexpected places. In this post I don’t want to explain all the different types. I am sure I have done that in the past on other posts. In fact, I am going to keep this article as brief as possible when it comes to text. To get straight to the point, I am sharing a clip from an episode of Young Sheldon. I hope you enjoy it. Watch below!
Did John
write the Gospel of John? Is this Gospel more historical than the Synoptic
Gospels (Mark, Luke, and Matthew)? I recently read an article on the Biblical
Archeology Society website that examines these questions. I highly
enjoyed reading it, and also recommend it. The article is titled: Gospel of John Commentary:
Who Wrote the Gospel of John and How Historical Is It? I am not going
to give away the findings, but you can read them for yourself at the link below.
Blessings!