If you wish to alter, spending time at the altar is a good place to start.
Sunday, December 26, 2021
Saturday, December 25, 2021
Thursday, November 25, 2021
Sunday, November 21, 2021
Golden Rule
“In everything do to others as you would have them do to you; for this is the law and the prophets."
- Matthew 7:12, NRSV
Sunday, November 14, 2021
Something by Hal Lindsey
In the last few years, there has been a disturbing movement in the Church to disregard or even disavow the Old Testament. It’s part of a misguided attempt to make God’s message more “agreeable” to modern minds. But Jesus and the New Testament are intrinsically linked to the Old Testament. The Lord tied His own credibility to that of the Old Testament. He proved His authenticity through an appeal to Old Testament prophecy.
The previous excerpt is from a recent post by Hal Lindsey. I thought it was a bit relevant to some things on this blog. Anyhow, I enjoyed reading. Hope you will, also. Read fully at the link below. Blessings!
Sunday, October 31, 2021
Monsters and the Bible
Monsters are an ever-present feature of modern cinema, from Dracula to the Kraken. However, monsters are by no means a modern invention, and many of the same creatures that inhabit our modern horror movies have roots that stretch back thousands of years…. (biblicalarchaeology.org).
Firstly, Happy Halloween! The foregoing excerpt is from an article by Nathan Steinmeyer titled: Biblical Monsters Seven mysterious creatures of the biblical world. The article is published on Bible History Daily and from the BAS (Biblical Archeology Society) Library. Anyhow, if biblical monsters interest you, I encourage you to read the full article at the following link. Blessings!
Sunday, October 17, 2021
On new posts
In case there are no new post to read, it is either that I am on a hiatus or simply not posting. In the past I have posted regularly on here; however, in the future posts may or may not appear regularly.
Saturday, September 25, 2021
Church business or business of the church
“Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone."
- Jesus
I will say a
few things in case anyone doesn't want to read further after what I’ve
said. Of course, something we don't read could be an idea which never crossed our
minds, previously. This may almost be a brief rant, but it’s not intended as a
diatribe. Yes, the introductory quote will be relevant. That quote is relevant
in Christianity because if Jesus didn’t want to be called good, it’s probably a
beneficial concept to pursue ourselves. “Why do you call me good? No one is
good but God alone." I know many who consider themselves progressive
Christians. There is nothing wrong with being a Christian wanting a better
Christianity. Certainly, some portions of Christian history aren’t all that
admirable; however, some were indeed. For example, Mother Teresa and many
others were exemplary in their faith. We can’t change history. We must take the
good with the bad, and then again often this is true for all aspects of life.
My concern in this post is that if we really shouldn’t call ourselves good, we should
be careful in judging others. Well, that is my introduction, here we go.
First and
foremost, if we judge, we are not progressives. We are simply someone being
critical of someone who has a slightly different worldview. We may as well
accept we are also fundamentalists with a different worldview than the one we
believe is wrong. A good question I like to ask is can I prove the other person
is wrong in their view? Furthermore, if we answer yes because it's how we interpret
Scriptures, I rest my case. We are then obviously fundamentalists like any
other, but with a different view (or a different type). Based on my experience,
if one is really searching, our worldview might change more than once throughout
our life, depending on many factors. This doesn’t mean we shouldn’t question or
challenge what doesn’t seem right.
We constantly
must evaluate right and wrong as we grow in our spiritual lives. I personally
question many things. A good example for me is should the Lord's message be
given freely? I have always thought, yes. Did Jesus say in The Great Commission
go into all the world and charge a hefty fee for the good news? Some aspects of
church have become a business. Yes, there are some who have private jets, and
all sorts of things to aid in spreading their message. A lot of that message is
interpretation of Scripture by them. Sadly, Scriptures are often interpreted for
someone's own personal benefit. If we look at church history, not just using a Sola-Scriptura
worldview, we might learn that some of the customs of the early fathers were not
the way we've interpreted them to be today. This is probably why many prefer not
to study history that much. There’s much in Scriptures that can enlighten us
about making a living from the Good News. For instance, from Scriptures alone
we know that Saint Paul was a tent maker. He worked secularly. Don't get me wrong,
everyone knows if one is fair and honest in what they do. Do your own self-analysis.
It is always good to check where we are at a certain moment in time like the
present. I will stop here. Blessings!
Friday, August 20, 2021
A video on Biblical Archeology
I ran across this very informative video on YouTube at ReligionForBreakfast. A description of their site is as follows:
An educational channel dedicated to the academic,
nonsectarian study of religion. We promote improving the public's religious
literacy by exploring humanity's beliefs and rituals through an
anthropological, sociological, and archaeological lens.
Religion for Breakfast does not endorse any particular
religious tradition or non-religious perspective. Please be respectful in the
comments!
The host, Dr. Andrew M. Henry, is a scholar of religious
studies. His research focus is early Christianity and late Roman religion and
earned his PhD at Boston University. Follow him on Twitter @andrewmarkhenry.
These videos are freely available here on YouTube. If you are
an instructor, feel free to use the YouTube link to my videos in your syllabi
and classrooms. I do not permit downloading my videos and re-uploading them to
a separate site or channel. This is called freebooting, and it violates
Religion for Breakfast's copyright.
Anyhow the
video is titled Introduction to Biblical Archaeology. Hope you enjoy
watching.
Saturday, July 10, 2021
An article on Mary Magdalene
I have been
wanting to share an article on Mary Magdalene which was recently published by Biblical
Archaeology Society. The article initially raises the question, How did her
reputation evolve “from saint to sinner”? I personally do not recall ever
hearing that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute or the wife of Jesus while growing
up in my parents’ home. Perhaps, the reason for the foregoing was because there
is extraordinarily little evidence for those ideas in the canonized scriptures.
I am aware of how the ideas came about and were promoted, but even with
Scriptures aside, it is probably difficult to make those cases. I mean if one
leaves it to Hollywood and media, they will fabricate anything and make it seem
credible. For instance, they can take John DeLorean’s life and make it look
like he was just a drug dealer (a tragic flaw due to desperation, no doubt)
while overlooking his education and brilliance. If most people had the drive
and talent Mr. DeLorean had, we would have a far more advanced society than we
currently have, but I do not want to get sidetracked from the article in
reference.
I am sharing
the article from BAS titled: Was Mary Magdalene Wife of Jesus? Was Mary
Magdalene a Prostitute? The BAS staff shares a work by Birger A. Pearson
titled: “From Saint to Sinner.” Pearson’s writing is scholarly. He references
Jane Schaberg, for example. I am not doing an analysis on the article. I am
merely briefly describing it with the hope it interests you into reading it. I
certainly enjoyed. Anyhow, enough said, for now. Read the article at the link
below.
Monday, June 7, 2021
Saturday, May 15, 2021
Hans Küng passed away on April 6, 2021
Catholic theologian Hans Küng was buried April 16 in the
southwestern German city of Tübingen following funeral services. Küng, a native
of Switzerland, died on April 6 at the age of 93 (www.ncronline.org/).
The
foregoing excerpt is from the National Catholic Reporter. The article also reads as follows.
The world-renowned theologian planned the final ceremonies
himself, with the saying of prayers that he formulated and the performance of
cantatas by Johann Sebastian Bach and compositions by Felix Mendelssohn
Bartholdy. Due to ongoing pandemic restrictions in Germany, only a limited
number of people were present. The local television broadcaster SWR carried the
ceremonies live.
In the funeral sermon, Fr. Wolfgang Gramer said Küng had
fought for the freedom of God's children, including in his efforts to challenge
what he viewed as the wrongly understood dogma of papal infallibility. The
Vatican and the German bishops had withdrawn Küng's teaching license in 1979
partly because of the theologian's critique of the dogma (www.ncronline.org/).
I personally
never had the opportunity to meet Hans Küng, but if you are interested in
finding out more about him, it will not be too difficult to find a plethora of
material written about him or by him. The world of Theology and Ecumenism lost
a hero on April 6, 2021. I do not think I can share more about him than what
others have said. I strongly recommend reading more about him if you have never
done so. I certainly have found him very inspiring for many years.
The Catholic
Weekly said the following:
Hans Küng certainly had talent. His doctoral dissertation on
Karl Barth, arguably the greatest of 20th-century Protestant theologians,
became a pioneering book in ecumenical theology.
The Guardian published the following about
Küng:
Despite the impression that this self-confident, clever and
ever so slightly vain priest may have given, Küng was not one of nature’s rebels.
His chosen approach would have been to work from within, but the Catholic
church in his heyday was intolerant of such dissenting voices among its
priests. If the choice was silence or uneasy internal exile, he was not going
to bite his tongue.
When challenged about his maverick role in the history of
modern Catholicism, he remained fond to the end of quoting one of his heroes,
Pope Gregory the Great: “If scandal is taken as the truth, then it is better to
allow scandal to arise than to abandon the truth.”
As I said
before, it will not be too difficult to find a plethora of material written about
Hans Küng, or written by him. A warning, however, be prepared to be informed. I
really cannot say more than others who knew him well, so I will end here.
Regardless, it is an honor to do this brief homage to him. Rest in Peace, Hans
Küng. A final note: feel free to click on the links to the referenced articles
below to read more.
References:
https://www.catholicweekly.com.au/george-weigel-hans-kung-and-the-perils-of-fame/
https://www.ncronline.org/news/people/funeral-hans-k-ng-celebrated-ecumenist-great-spiritual-teacher
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/08/hans-kung-obituary
Saturday, April 17, 2021
A reflection on the funeral
Personally, I have a difficult time accepting a government of unelected officials. Obviously, dictatorships fall into this category, but I will listen to a defense in favor depending. I can understand why England doesn't completely abolish the monarchy and that tradition, perhaps. It is constitutional and representational, after all, and this is symbolic. Please don't assume that I am making any comparisons with tyrannical dictatorships because I opened with this idea. These are just my thoughts, which I decided to write down.
I was watching the funeral for the Duke of Edinburgh, and immediately, in my mind, I object to some things simply seeing the procession into St. George's Chapel. One thing that is certain is that Anthony Fauci probably influenced...all participants wearing black masks, but this should not be a distraction...lol. All male Royals exhibit medals on their jackets. I know that many have served in the military, including Prince Philip. In my mind, however, I associate this with dictatorships. Dictatorships often will display leaders wearing a military uniform, and medals even if the person never served in the military. Why is this? Well, obviously, it's for psychological affects. Humans often respect a uniform and medals without questioning; consequently, subordination can be or come as an automatic response. Of course, some people will always question and not easily follow. Questioning all is a good thing in my mind. Anyhow, back to the funeral, which I may watch later on eventually.I seem to have a problem with the idea that a monarch can have a lofty and expensive funeral, but a common man often cannot. I am not a communist, and I don't believe all should be equal, although I do believe in equal opportunity which doesn't necessarily mandate an equal outcome. In other words, free choices are good, but not the idea that someone makes the choice for me because I believe God has made us all unique individuals. All humans should be allowed respectful treatment at the time they pass on. Of course, a state funeral often has many other implications such as the exhibition of power and wealth, meaning we can do this because we are able, capable, and so on....
To conclude, I don't want to discourage anyone from watching the funeral for Prince Philip, I was an admirer of his. Moreover, it is a church service. After all, I am still a nonpracticing Anglican, last time I checked. So far, I have made this post about me, and how I feel about someone else being honored, and in my mind I am being disrespectful. So, I will stop here. The point I wanted to make was really to question all, evaluate, and decide what is right and what isn't. Rest in Peace Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh.
Sunday, March 28, 2021
Article about the Upper Room
The traditional location of the Last Supper—the Crusader era “Upper Room,” known also as the Cenacle—has one thing going for it: height. The only location-specific information we can pull from the various Last Supper accounts is that Jesus and his apostles secured a large furnished space, the upper room of an unnamed (and presumably wealthy) householder in Jerusalem (Mark 14:12-16). The Cenacle stands tall indeed, nesting above David’s tomb on the heights of Mount Zion. But who knew that Mount Zion’s Christian claim to fame has a competitor—in a basement (www.biblicalarchaeology.org)?
The
foregoing excerpt is from an article by Jonathan Klawans titled: The Other
Upper Room. It is published on the BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY SOCIETY
website. Read the full article at the link below.
Reference:
Friday, March 26, 2021
Isaiah 50
Isaiah 50
New Revised Standard Version50 Thus says the Lord:
Where is your mother’s bill of divorce
with which I put her away?
Or which of my creditors is it
to whom I have sold you?
No, because of your sins you were sold,
and for your transgressions your mother was put away.
2 Why was no one there when I came?
Why did no one answer when I called?
Is my hand shortened, that it cannot redeem?
Or have I no power to deliver?
By my rebuke I dry up the sea,
I make the rivers a desert;
their fish stink for lack of water,
and die of thirst.[a]
3 I clothe the heavens with blackness,
and make sackcloth their covering.
The Servant’s Humiliation and Vindication
4 The Lord God has given me
the tongue of a teacher,[b]
that I may know how to sustain
the weary with a word.
Morning by morning he wakens—
wakens my ear
to listen as those who are taught.
5 The Lord God has opened my ear,
and I was not rebellious,
I did not turn backward.
6 I gave my back to those who struck me,
and my cheeks to those who pulled out the beard;
I did not hide my face
from insult and spitting.
7 The Lord God helps me;
therefore I have not been disgraced;
therefore I have set my face like flint,
and I know that I shall not be put to shame;
8 he who vindicates me is near.
Who will contend with me?
Let us stand up together.
Who are my adversaries?
Let them confront me.
9 It is the Lord God who helps me;
who will declare me guilty?
All of them will wear out like a garment;
the moth will eat them up.
10 Who among you fears the Lord
and obeys the voice of his servant,
who walks in darkness
and has no light,
yet trusts in the name of the Lord
and relies upon his God?
11 But all of you are kindlers of fire,
lighters of firebrands.[c]
Walk in the flame of your fire,
and among the brands that you have kindled!
This is what you shall have from my hand:
you shall lie down in torment.
Footnotes
• Isaiah 50:2 Or die on the thirsty ground
• Isaiah 50:4 Cn: Heb of those who are taught
• Isaiah 50:11 Syr: Heb you gird yourselves with firebrands
Source:
www.biblegateway.com
Saturday, February 13, 2021
BAS Has A New Editor
The Biblical Archaeology Society is pleased to announce that
Dr. Glenn J. Corbett, a Near Eastern archaeologist and long-time associate and
contributing editor to the Society, will serve as the new Editor of Biblical
Archaeology Review magazine beginning March 2021 (www.biblicalarchaeology.org).
The foregoing announcement from BAS is an excerpt from a recent article. If you follow them, as I do, read the full article at the following link. Blessings!
Sunday, January 17, 2021
Can we pray for the dead?
I am sure many read the title to this post and immediately had a response to the question being asked. One’s individual response was most likely relevant to our denominational upbringing, or current beliefs. Some Christian groups or denominations have issues with the idea of praying for those who have passed on, and some do not. In this post, I am not going to discuss the theological foundation for any arguments whether in favor or opposing. However, I will share my own belief and argument, which has changed somewhat over time. I will ask the main the question I have asked myself with relevance to the subject.
Here is the
question I ask. Is God affected or governed by time? My response is that I
think God is outside of the time continuum and unaffected by time. So, yes, I believe
one can pray for those who have passed on. If we do decide to pray, we may be
praying for them, even if years later, during the time when they were still
alive on Earth, and God can still answer the prayers during that time and our
time. Past, present, or future most likely have all already taken place in the
mind of God. The foregoing idea just may be my own slightly radical theological
view but take it or leave it. I will share some New Testament texts that may or
may not be relevant.
Jesus prayed
after four days for a close friend who passed away and was buried, and his
friend woke up (resurrected). Read the Gospel according to John 11: 1 to 44 to
get the whole story. The Gospel of Matthew 27: 50-53 makes some interesting
reading, as well. Allow me to share it?
50 Then Jesus cried again with a loud voice and breathed his
last.[a] 51 At that moment the curtain of the temple was torn in two, from top
to bottom. The earth shook, and the rocks were split. 52 The tombs also were
opened, and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised. 53
After his resurrection they came out of the tombs and entered the holy city and
appeared to many (NRSV, Bible).
The
foregoing verses may seem to not be related to praying for the dead, but they
do seem make the point that death is seemingly not a major obstacle for God, if
one believes of course. Now, doubt and disbelief are an entirely different
subject not discussed in this post, but not ignored in others. I just wanted to
make a quick post to make us think on this subject. Blessings
Reference:
NRSV, Bible.